The Trial of Truth
by Shelby Cade
This past week I was summoned for jury duty. I was pretty sure I would not be picked being that the entire Sheriff’s department meets with the church I pastor. Sure enough, I was not one of the 24 that was originally called before it had to be narrowed down to 12. The process was interesting and I hope to serve one day as a juror. One of the interesting statements made by the district judge was, "Drawing from a large diverse group of individuals will help in finding truth." The statement implies that truth can be known. A second statement made by the judge was, "The evidence should lead the decision process."
Concerning truth, it was not only clear from the judge’s statement that it is knowable, but was implied that truth is objective. What is truth anyway? Truth is that which corresponds with reality or representing things as they really are. This is referred to as the correspondence theory of truth. All individuals use the correspondence theory of truth in their everyday life. Giving directions in how to go from point A to point B is using the correspondence theory. Think of what the world would be like if we didn’t believe in the correspondence theory of truth? We could never know if someone was telling the truth or crying wolf.
For anyone to deny the knowability or objective nature of truth is an impossible feat. Relativism does just that. Relativism, in essence, denies that truth can be known or that it is objective, hence the term relativism. The problem that makes relativism untenable is that it can not show why anyone should accept relativism. It is logically impossible to support relativism, for when one states that relativism is the correct view they contradict themselves by making objectively true statements…
FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>
|Recommended Resources: Relativism: Feet Firmly Planted in Mid-Air / True for You, But Not for Me: Overcoming Objections to Christian Faith|