When you hit reality
by Shelby Cade
“Where do we come from?” and “What is real?” are two of the most puzzling and debated questions in the history of philosophical thought. Today, the philosopher does not have the the microphone as in the past. Today, it is the scientific community that has been given the reigns of authority when truth is in question. In the past, the Christian community had some authority, but a paradigm shift occurred with Darwin’s publication of the “Origin of Species” in 1859.
What does the scientific community have to make it the supposed bearer of truth? With the medical advancements and the continued progress of science, it is easy to see why many would turn to science for answers. But, what about the big questions of life, does science have absolute authority to answer?
One of the primary driving forces of science is the idea of empiricism. Empiricism deals with sense experience. In other words, all knowledge is driven by sense experience alone. This makes the natural world the only world by which knowledge can be achieved. Supernatural, therefore, is confined to superstition and fairy tale status.
If science is indeed king, then it follows that science should answer all, or at least point us to the truth of what is real. Does the scientific method or science in general meet the criteria for answering all truth claims? No, for the statement itself is not able to be tested in the lab, by the scientific method, or by any scientific means…
FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>