I regard consensus science as an extremely pernicious development that ought to be stopped cold in its tracks. Historically, the claim of consensus has been the first refuge of scoundrels; it is a way to avoid debate by claiming that the matter is already settled. Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet because you’re being had.
Let’s be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. – Michael Crichton
Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world.//
The genetic code is the set of rules by which information encoded in genetic material (DNA or mRNA sequences) is translated into proteins (amino acid sequences) by living cells.
I have valid and verified evidence, that references the real world, showing that DNA was designed by an intelligent designer.
No one questions Morse code has a intelligent designer, DNA is not so unlike Morse code.
When ever you find code, you find a programer/designer.
DNA CODE MORSE CODE
AUG- codon 1 .- ..- –.
ACG- codon 2 .- -.-. –.
GAG- codon 3 –. .- –.
CUU- codon 4 -.-. ..- ..-
CGG- codon 5 -.-. –. –.
AGU- codon 6 .- –. ..-
UAG- codon 7 ..- .- –.
Look up this code to translate line of code.
http://www.onlineconversion.com/morse_code.htm
— — .-. … . + -.-. — -.. . + …. .- … + .- -. + .. -. – . .-.. .-.. .. –. . -. – + -.. . … .. –. -. . .-. + -.. -. .- + .. … + -.-. — -.. . + .- -. -.. + …. .- … + .- -. + .. -. – . .-.. .-.. .. –. . -. – + -.. . … .. –. -. . .-.
A code is a rule for converting a piece of information (for example, a letter, word, phrase, or gesture) into another form or representation (one sign into another sign), not necessarily of the same type.
There, I guess that makes me a scientist… 😉