Isn’t the universe eternal? (Thus doing away with the need for a creator)

by Scott Youngren

“The universe had a beginning. There was once nothing and now there is something.” –Janna Levin, from the Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics at Cambridge University

A universe with a finite past requires a beginning, which in turn requires a transcendent (or supernatural) cause.  This is why our universe must be eternal for atheism to be valid.  But Big Bang cosmology has shown that the universe is NOT eternal. In  New Proofs for the Existence of God, Robert J. Spitzer (who was assisted by Dr. Stephen Barr of the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Delaware) reveals that:

“Prior to Einstein’s publication of the General Theory of Relativity, one could have thought that supernatural design was completely unnecessary because it was believed (in accordance with Newton’s postulates) that the universe existed for an infinite amount of time with an infinite amount of space and an infinite amount of interacting content. Therefore, there would have been an infinite number of ‘tries’ [for randomness to produce an orderly universe] to bring about virtually any degree of complexity.

Standard Big Bang cosmology totally changed these postulates, and reduced the total number of “tries” in the observable universe to a very finite number…..This comparatively small number of ‘total possible mass energy interactions in the universe for all time’ revealed the extreme improbability of high degrees of complexity arising out of the universe by pure chance.”

Further, this book also states that “David Hilbert (the father of finite mathematics) has given new probative force and depth to the argument for the intrinsic finitude of past time…


Isn’t the universe eternal? (Thus doing away with the need for a creator) «

The Poached Egg Apologetics