Shoulders of Giants? -Philosophy and Science in Context, or, “Lawrence Krauss jumps off!”

by J.W. Wartick

shoulders of giantsIf I have seen further [than other scientists/philosophers] it is by standing on ye shoulders of Giants.– Isaac Newton

We act as if they’re [philosophers without current knowledge of science] authorities about something; they knew nothing!– Lawrence Krauss

Lawrence Krauss recently appeared on the English [UK] radio show “Unbelievable?” In this radio program, Krauss and Randy Holder, a Christian, were in dialog about “A Universe from Nothing?” [not necessarily Krauss’ book, but the subject in general]. The dialog, unfortunately, showed that Krauss continues in his ignorance of the importance of philosophy to his own subject, as well as his own flippant dismissal of generations of scientists.

At one point in the program (around the 26:00 mark), Krauss says the following:

I don’t [indiscernible–he may say "also"] care about what Mr. Leibniz said… we refer to philosophers who wrote at a time when we didn’t know that there were a hundred billion galaxies. [So?] Who cares what they say? We act as if they’re authorities about something; they knew nothing!- Lawrence Krauss

Really?

I can’t think of a more galling statement for a contemporary cosmologist to make. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, for those who don’t know, happened to be one of the men who discovered infinitesimal calculus. He also (among countless other contributions to mathematics, science, social sciences, engineering, and philosophy)  developed a calculator, contributed to the development of binary language, was one of the first to posit that space was relative, and developed the principle of sufficient reason (which supports all scientific investigation).

Yet, according to Krauss, because he lived in a time before we know how large the universe was, he “knew nothing!” You see, Krauss, and some other scientists and thinkers with a scientistic/physicalist bent, too often throw out the very basis of their thought. How far do you think Krauss could get in his cosmological research without infinitesimal calculus? How would Krauss go about investigating the causes of various natural phenomena without the principle of sufficient reason?

The answer is pretty simple: he wouldn’t get anywhere…

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>

The Poached Egg ApologeticsShoulders of Giants? -Philosophy and Science in Context, or, “Lawrence Krauss jumps off!” – Always Have a Reason

 

RECOMMENDED READING:

Who Made God? Searching for a Theory of Everything

Why the Universe Is the Way It Is

 

Shop-at-Amazon-and-help-support-The-[1]Shop at Amazon and help support The Poached Egg!