Making Sense of Scripture’s ‘Inconsistency’

by Tim Keller

apologetics - bible inconsistenciesI find it frustrating when I read or hear columnists, pundits, or journalists dismiss Christians as inconsistent because "they pick and choose which of the rules in the Bible to obey." Most often I hear, "Christians ignore lots of Old Testament texts—about not eating raw meat or pork or shellfish, not executing people for breaking the Sabbath, not wearing garments woven with two kinds of material and so on. Then they condemn homosexuality. Aren’t you just picking and choosing what you want to believe from the Bible?"

I don’t expect everyone to understand that the whole Bible is about Jesus and God’s plan to redeem his people, but I vainly hope that one day someone will access their common sense (or at least talk to an informed theological adviser) before leveling the charge of inconsistency.

First, it’s not only the Old Testament that has proscriptions about homosexuality. The New Testament has plenty to say about it as well. Even Jesus says, in his discussion of divorce in Matthew 19:3-12, that the original design of God was for one man and one woman to be united as one flesh, and failing that (v. 12), persons should abstain from marriage and sex.

However, let’s get back to considering the larger issue of inconsistency regarding things mentioned in the Old Testament no longer practiced by the New Testament people of God. Most Christians don’t know what to say when confronted about this issue. Here’s a short course on the relationship of the Old Testament to the New Testament…

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>

The Poached Egg ApologeticsMaking Sense of Scripture’s ‘Inconsistency’ – The Gospel Coalition Blog

 

RECOMMENDED FOR FURTHER READING:

Has God Spoken?: Proof of the Bible’s Divine Inspiration

How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth

 

Shop-at-Amazon-and-help-support-The-[1]Shop at Amazon and help support The Poached Egg!