A Follow-Up To “Letter To An Atheist”
by Marc Gaerlan
Someone responded to the “Letter To An Atheist” post on the Christian Apologetics Alliance website (apologeticalliance.com) and I started to reply. What happened was that my reply became over 600 words, so I decided to just make that reply a new post, a follow-up to “Letter To An Atheist” that addresses the issue of intellectual integrity. Here it is:
It’s intellectually easy to continue to question that which we already dispute. I think we find an intellectual “comfort zone” in doing that. The problem is it makes us intellectually lazy, and an unfortunate byproduct of that is we become intellectually dishonest with ourselves. We begin to ignore and set aside the authentic journey of discovery.
I think it’s intellectually vital that Christians, and especially those who would categorize themselves as Christian apologists, become familiar with the works of Hitchens, Dawkins, Ehrman, etc, and not ignore any point or statement they make. To look into what they say with the intellectual integrity of not summarily and arbitrarily dismissing what they say, but to take a good hard look at their statements and consider all the possibilities from a rational, reasonable, and fully educated point of view.
‘Like’ The Poached Egg on Facebook! Follow @ThePoachedEgg
Many are of the mindset, whether they admit it or not, that being “fully educated” on a matter is to know and hold to all the arguments that agree with that they already hold to be true. This is the very definition of bias.
I talked about bias in the “Letter To An Atheist”. An example of this that immediately comes to mind is this: I’ve come across countless atheists who deny that Jesus of Nazareth existed; That he was a real, actual flesh and blood human being that walked the earth 2000 years ago. To myself, and any educated person, whether atheist or Christian, this is a preposterous claim.
For example, historian Bart Ehrman, an agnostic leaning towards atheism appeared on “The Infidel Guy” web broadcast for an interview. The host relayed a question from his chat room that asked “do you believe in the historical Jesus” and followed with “that’s a good question”. Ehrman, after commenting that people often misquote him as saying he doesn’t believe in the existence of Jesus said “I don’t think there’s any serious historian who doubts the existence of Jesus”. The host seemed to become increasingly bothered by Ehrmans’ answer…
FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>
RECOMMENDED APOLOGETICS RESOURCES FOR FURTHER READING: