Can we know anything if Naturalism is true? Or: A plea for creativity with Theistic Arguments

by Paul Gould

knowledgeIn my last post, I considered John Calvin’s claim that we cannot know God unless we  know ourselves and (conversely), we cannot know ourselves unless we know God. Calvin thinks there is a tight relationship between the knowledge of God and the knowledge of man. Here I want to consider a deeper concern: Can we have knowledge of anything if God does not exist?In his recently released book Naturalism and Our Knowledge of Reality[1], Scott Smith argues that we cannot. Scott’s book is a bold and sustained attack of naturalism and its ability to deliver us knowledge. His master argument is a kind of transcendental argument: If philosophical naturalism is true, then we do not have knowledge of reality. We do have knowledge of reality, therefore it is not the case that philosophical naturalism is true. The bulk of Scott’s book (in fact, Chapters 1-8) is concerned with showing the inability of naturalism to ground knowledge (he engages with the Direct Realism of D.M. Armstrong, the Representationalism of Dretske, Tye, and Lycan, Searle’s Naturalism, Papineau’s naturalized epistemology, Dennett’s neurophilosophy, the Churchland’s eliminativism, and Kim’s physicalism). Finally, in Chapter 9, Scott begins to build a positive case for the kind of ontology required for knowledge. Mental properties are sui generis, irreducible to the physical; knowledge requires substance dualism; and the “natural affinity” exhibited between mind and world is best explained via a divine mind. Thus, the reality of knowledge entails theism and a decidedly theistic world.

‘Like’ The Poached Egg on Facebook!

If correct, Smith’s thesis has huge implications. For, we clearly do know things. Thus, we find an argument, or probably a family of arguments, from the reality of knowledge to the existence of God.

And, if God exists, this is as it should be—if God is the creator of all things, that means that all knowledge (that is, all truths discovered) as well as knowledge itself—somehow connects to and illuminates the divine…

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>

The Poached Egg ApologeticsCan we know anything if Naturalism is true? Or: A plea for creativity with Theistic Arguments | Paul Gould

 

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED APOLOGETICS RESOURCES FOR FURTHER READING:

Is God Just a Human Invention? And Seventeen Other Questions Raised by the New Atheists

Evidence for God: 50 Arguments for Faith from the Bible, History, Philosophy, and Science

 

Shop-at-Amazon-and-help-support-The-[1]Shop at Amazon and help support The Poached Egg!