Is There Ever Enough Evidence for the Hyper-Skeptic?

by Bill Pratt

Recently I was listening to the Unbelievable podcast and heard something telling from atheist James Croft.  As he was discussing the historical, eyewitness evidence of Jesus’s resurrection with Christian Chris Sinkinson, he said the following (this is a paraphrase of what he said):

The amount of eyewitness testimony of the death and resurrection of Jesus can never be enough to convince me, and it shouldn’t be enough to convince any reasonable person.  I would never accept any amount of testimony as evidence of the resurrection.  The only way I would accept the death and resurrection of anyone is if there were detailed medical records, and there were medical professionals there to verify the death, and I could stand beside the corpse myself, watching what happened.

‘Like’ The Poached Egg on Facebook!

Croft, therefore, would never accept any testimony of any resurrection from the dead unless he saw it for himself and there were medical professionals there to certify all the facts.  But, of course, this means that he has conveniently set the bar so high that no resurrection claim from history could ever be believed.

By setting this impossibly high standard, Croft has to do no work, no investigation, no research, no thinking, no considering of the central claim of Christianity, the resurrection of Jesus.  For him, this would all be a colossal waste of time, because he has decided, based on his atheistic presuppositions, that resurrections don’t happen…

FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>

The Poached Egg ApologeticsIs There Ever Enough Evidence for the Hyper-Skeptic? | Tough Questions Answered

 

RECOMMENDED APOLOGETICS RESOURCES FOR FURTHER READING:

The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism

Reasonable Faith (3rd Edition): Christian Truth and Apologetics

 

Shop-at-Amazon-and-help-support-The-[1]Shop at Amazon and help support The Poached Egg!