Burden Of Proof And Atheist Intellectual Responsibility

Atheism Analyzed

Atheists virtually always deny that they have any Burden of Rebuttal when they claim to reject theist arguments and propositions. They merely claim that theists have not proven their case, or have not provided evidence. And they do so without any justification for their claim.
Said one Atheist:

” If there was such a thing as the burden of rebuttal you could never believe anything as there is an infinite number of concepts to rebuttal. Since this leads to absurdities, it is the burden of the one making the positive claim to provide evidence.” – Qualia Soup

There is likely to be only one valid rebuttal containing one sequence of valid premises; if the Atheist opposition cannot provide a valid refutation, then there are, of course, an infinite number of non-valid rebuttals based on non-valid premises. But that infinite regression has no bearing on whether there exists one, single valid rebuttal. The originator of the original argument is obliged to point out the non-validity of the false rebuttals, in other words, the theist will point out the errors in the Atheist’s false case. Of course, if there is no valid rebuttal, then the conversation will potentially go on infinitely while the rebuttor searches for a valid reason to rebut where none exists.

‘Like’ The Poached Egg on Facebook!
Join the TPE Support Team!

However, the Atheist is free to showcase his presumed intellectual abilities by demonstrating the actual, factual errors he perceives to exist in the theist proposition.

But the Atheist position is not really that. The position taken by Atheists is that they can “rationally” reject any argument without giving either a reason or reasoning for their rejection. They merely claim that the theist argument is “not evidence” (Note 1) or “not proven”(Note 2).
But that is not a rational position; it is, in fact, anti-rational. Given the opportunity to describe in detail what he thinks the standards are for either evidence or for logical deduction, the Atheist demurs and claims “no Burden of Rebuttal”. The internet is rife with this claim…

The Poached Egg Apologetics: Burden Of Proof And Atheist Intellectual ResponsibilityFOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>

Atheism Analyzed: Burden Of Proof And Atheist Intellectual Responsibility

 

RECOMMENDED APOLOGETICS RESOURCES FOR FURTHER READING:

Why God Won't Go Away: Is the New Atheism Running on Empty?Why God Won’t Go Away: Is the New Atheism Running on Empty?

Gunning for God: Why the New Atheists are Missing the TargetGunning for God: Why the New Atheists are Missing the Target

 

Shop-at-Amazon-and-help-support-The-[1]Shop at Amazon and help support The Poached Egg or donate now!