Can Archaeology Help Confirm the Bible?

by David Roach

Whenever there’s an archaeological discovery related to the Bible, conflicting interpretations by supposed experts can leave a believer’s head spinning. Take the recent discovery in Israel of a palace from the era of King David. An archaeologist from Hebrew University in Jerusalem says there’s “unequivocal evidence” that David and his descendants ruled at the site. But critics, including some committed believers, say it could have belonged to other kingdoms and that David’s palace likely would have been in Jerusalem some 18 miles to the northwest. Still others claim there is no archaeological evidence that David even existed. Similar confusion ensued this spring when archaeologists discovered a massive complex that may have been an administrative center in Abraham’s native Ur, with division over whether the patriarch’s Ur was at that site or farther north.

Since debate often surrounds the discovery of biblical sites, lovers of the Bible may be tempted to give up on archaeology, pronouncing it unhelpful and opting instead to accept Scripture’s historical accounts on “blind faith,” convinced that

‘Like’ The Poached Egg on Facebook!Join our Support Team!

historical evidence will never be able to confirm biblical accounts. Admittedly, archaeology’s main contribution to biblical studies has been to provide background information. But at the same time, 20th-century theologian Carl Henry reminded us that archaeologists have done significant work in confirming biblical claims (see God, Revelation and Authority , volume 4). Before you give up on archaeology, consider the following:

–In the late 1800s, critical scholars regarded the Hittites as an Old Testament fiction. Except for references in the Bible, there was no evidence they existed. Then archaeologists discovered some 10,000 Hittite and Akkadian texts and over time concluded that Hittites were the dominant power in Asia Minor until 1200 BC.

–Skeptics once regarded as ludicrous the claim that Moses wrote the first five books of the Bible, since writing was thought not to have existed in his day. But thanks to archaeology, we now know that full-fledged phonetically spelled writing existed as early as 2400 BC, well before Moses…

The Poached Egg Apologetics: Can Archaeology Help Confirm the Bible?FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO CONTINUE READING >>>

Can Archaeology Help Confirm the Bible? | The BibleMesh Blog

 

RECOMMENDED APOLOGETICS RESOURCES FOR FURTHER READING:

The Archaeological Study BibleThe Archaeological Study Bible: An Illustrated Walk Through Biblical History and Culture

The Stones Cry Out: What Archaeology Reveals About the Truth of the BibleThe Stones Cry Out: What Archaeology Reveals About the Truth of the Bible

 

You can help! Please join The Poached Egg Support TeamThe Poached Egg is a nonprofit ministry. Please join our support team with a monthly or special donation here. 

Shop-at-Amazon-and-help-support-The-[1]You can also help support TPE by shopping at Amazon through this link here.