The Atheists and the Hive
Shadow To Light
Jerry Coyne is right about a couple of things. Namely, that if atheism is true, there is no free will and there is no moral responsibility. But there is no reason to stop there. For example, if atheism is true, there is no such thing as individual rights. If atheism is true, the individual is subservient to the collective. The individual is dispensable, the individual is replaceable, the individual is transient. It is the collective that matters, for it is the collective that functions as the substitute for God in a godless worldview. In other words, the atheist has an insect-like perspective on the world, where each member of the Hive only has meaning and purpose in relationship to the Hive.
Coyne himself provides a nice glimpse of this Hive mindset when defending his attack on moral responsibility. He writes:
That is this: I favor the notion of holding people responsible for good and bad actions, but not morally responsible. That is, people are held accountable for, say, committing a crime,because punishing them simultaneously acts as a deterrent, a device for removing them from society, and a way to get them rehabilitated—if that’s possible…….. That said, all the strictures and punishments I mentioned yesterday still hold, and retributive punishment is still out. But moral responsibility implies free choices, and those don’t exist.
|‘Like’ The Poached Egg on Facebook!||Follow @ThePoachedEgg
||Join our Support Team!|
Now someone will ask this: “Why not punish innocent people because that could also serve as a deterrent?” I don’t agree with that because such a strategy is bad for society for two reasons. It removes two of the three justifications for punishment (rehabilitation and removal from society of dangerous elements), and has the additional deleterious effect of making everyone scared that they can be arrested and punished even if they’re completely innocent. That casts a bad pall over society, making everyone paranoid.
Very interesting. “Why not punish innocent people because that could also serve as a deterrent?” I can answer that very easily – Because it is wrong. Because it violates individual rights. Notice it does not even occur to Coyne that such actions would be wrong.
Instead, Coyne’s atheism causes him to seek his answer from the Hive. The only reason not to punish innocent people to serve as a deterrent is because it could hurt the Hive…
RECOMMENDED APOLOGETICS RESOURCES FOR FURTHER READING:
You can also help support TPE by shopping at Amazon through this link here.