The Two Guys to Blame for the Myth of Constant Warfare between Religion and Science
by Justin Taylor
Ronald Numbers, an Agnostic scholar who is one of the leading historians on the relationship of science and religion, writes:
The greatest myth in the history of science and religion holds that they have been in a state of constant conflict.
Timothy Larsen, a Christian historian who specializes in the nineteenth century, notes:
The so-called “war” between faith and learning, specifically between orthodox Christian theology and science, was manufactured during the second half of the nineteenth century. It is a construct that was created for polemical purposes.
No one deserves more blame for this stubborn myth than these two men:
In December of 1869, Andrew White—the young and beleaguered Cornell president—delivered a lecture at Cooper Union in New York City entitled ”The Battle-Fields of Science.” He melodramatically painted a picture of a longstanding warfare between religion and science:
I propose, then, to present to you this evening an outline of the great sacred struggle for the liberty of Science—a struggle which has been going on for so many centuries. A tough contest this has been! A war continued longer—with battles fiercer, with sieges more persistent, with strategy more vigorous than in any of the comparatively petty warfares of Alexander, or Caesar, or Napoleon . . . In all modern history, interference with Science in the supposed interest of religion—no matter how conscientious such interference may have been—has resulted in the direst evils both to Religion and Science, and invariably.
His lecture was published in book form seven years later as The Warfare of Science (1876).
In 1874, Professor Draper published his History of the Conflict Between Religion and Science (New York: D. Appleton and Co., 1874). His thesis was as follows:
The antagonism we thus witness between Religion and Science is the continuation of a struggle that commenced when Christianity began to attain political power. . . . The history of Science is not a mere record of isolated discoveries; it is a narrative of the conflict of two contending powers, the expansive force of the human intellect on one side, and the compression arising from traditionary faith and human interests on the other.
Draper’s work was enormously popular, going through 50 editions in the next half century…
FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE >>>