3 More Logical Fallacies to Avoid (and How to Tell When Someone Else is Committing Them)
by Mark Farnham
[This post continues the series on Logic and Apologetics begun in previous posts]
Logical fallacies are flaws in reasoning that superficially seem to be sound, but upon examination are found to be false. The power of logical fallacies is that even after they have been shown to be flawed, they still retain their power to convince because they are often emotionally satisfying.
- Red Herring—an argument that seems to support a person’s position, but in reality, has nothing to do with the question at hand. The name of this fallacy is derived from the practice of dragging a bag of red herring across a scent trail, so dogs would be distracted and lose the scent. When the question at hand is ignored and a related idea is argued instead, a red herring has been committed. This is a difficult fallacy to spot. We must always fight mental confusion and drift to maintain clarity on what the real issue is.
How Christians do this:
“It doesn’t matter that there are so many religions in the world. Christianity is still the truth. You don’t have to eat all the different kinds of cereals at the grocery store to have a favorite.”
“If the Bible is not true, then you must be saying that my grandparents were wasting their time when they read a Bible verse each day of their lives.”
How unbelievers do this:
“How can Christianity be true when there are so many more ways that the church could be helping the homeless?”
“I know God is not real, because I asked him to show himself to me in some way and he didn’t.”…