Category: Philosophy

The “Spiderman fallacy” argument against Christianity?

There’s several approaches one can take in response to this meme.  The articles “Why?Outreach” linked in response to this meme is include “Does Spider-Man Really Exist?” and “Jesus and the Spiderman Fallacy.”

I thought I chime in with my response.

Read More

Why Strong Scientism is Self-Refuting

You can help break the grip of strong scientism on people’s thinking by showing how it is self-refuting.

What is a self-refuting statement? Such a statement has three features: (1) The claim establishes some requirement of acceptability for an assertion (such as having to be empirically verifiable). (2) The claim places itself in subjection to the requirement. (3) Then the claim falls short of satisfying the requirement of acceptability that the assertion itself stipulates. In other words, when a statement is included in its own subject matter (i.e., when it refers to itself) but fails to satisfy its own standards of acceptability, it is self-refuting.

Read More

Why is there Something Rather Than Nothing?

“The first question that should rightly be asked is, ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’” This is the question Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) posed in regards to the origin of the universe as a part of his argument for the existence of God.

Here is a brief and simplified explanation of what has come to be known as the Leibniz Contingency Argument, or the Leibniz Cosmological Argument (cosmology being the study of the origin of the cosmos, or universe).

The logic of the argument goes like this:

Read More

Miracles: “Do Extraordinary Claims Require Extraordinary Evidence?”

What is the definition of a miracle? Theologians and philosophers have offered numerous definitions. For example, Peter Kreeft says, a miracle is “a striking and religiously significant intervention of God in the system of natural causes.” (1) So we might say that a miracle is a special act of God in the natural world, something nature would not have done on its own. In the Bible, miracles have a distinctive purpose: they are used for three reasons

Read More

Who Pushed the Domino? (Or, The Kalam Cosmological Argument)

Imagine you enter into a room where you see a long series of falling dominoes. Given that you weren’t there to observe the first domino being pushed, you turn to your friend (who was in the room before you) and ask, “Did you push the first domino?”

Shaking  his head, your friend responds, “No, I didn’t. As a matter of fact, nobody did. This series of falling dominoes is infinitely long and has been forever.”

At this point, you intuitively know that it is either the case that your friend is lying, or he/she is a few fries short of a Happy Meal. Our minds seem to know that an infinitely-long series of falling dominoes are not possible, and that there must be a first domino and someone to push this first domino to make any number of successive dominoes to fall.

A similar intuition is what led to the formulation of a theistic argument called the ‘Kalam cosmological argument’. Like the domino example, it crucially relies on the idea that an actual infinite series of events is an absurdity.

Read More

Responding to Scientism and Secularism: Interview with J.P. Moreland

J.P. Moreland is one of the 50 most influential living philosophers. He’s also a colleague and friend of mine at Talbot School of Theology, Biola University. He has spent his career writing largely in the philosophy of mind and the intersection of science and faith.

He considers his most recent book, Scientism and Secularism, to be one of his most important contributions yet. It is a book with philosophical depth but is written for non-specialists. I would highly recommend it for thoughtful Christians today. Check out this quick interview and think about pre-ordering a copy of his excellent book.

Read More

Can Christians Be MEGA SURE of God’s Existence – Part 2

In the last blog, we asked the question “Why is there something rather than nothing.” Many atheists would say it just is. It’s a brute fact. Christians say, “God” is the reason there is something rather than nothing. Regardless of the answer as to why there is something (us, the earth, the universe), we all should ask the question “is our answer reasonable?”

As I just stated Christians claim God is the reason there is something. Last week began to laid out 1 of 2 lines of evidence that show Christians can be MEGA SURE that God exists. We looked at the acronym MEGA to provide scientific rationale for our belief in God. In this blog, I will look at how we can be SURE in our second line of evidence.

The second line of evidence for God’s existence is called the Cosmological argument. Simply put, the cosmological argument is the argument for causation. In other words, every effect must have a cause.

Read More

Donate $25 to help us thrive!

Become a TPE Supporter

Become a TPE Supporter

Featured Book

what is man

Featured Event

National Conference on Christian Apologetics Oct. 12-13

National Conference on Christian Apologetics: Ravi Zacharias, Chip Ingram, Frank Turek, J. Warner Wallace, and more



TPE Around the World

Pin It on Pinterest